JTD 1956 Alfa Romeo JTD 1956

Модульний 4-циліндровий двигун з турбонаддувом, відомий своєю ефективністю та надійністю при правильному обслуговуванні.

Brand: Alfa Romeo Type: Diesel Configuration: Inline-4 Production Years: 2005 - теперішній час Production: Pratola Serra, Italy
48 Brand engines
3 Modifications

Technical Specifications

Engine Displacement 2.0 L (1,956 cc)
Configuration Inline-4
Number of Cylinders 4
Valves per Cylinder 4
Power 120 - 210 л.с.
Torque 320 - 470 Н*м
Cylinder Bore 83.00 mm
Piston Stroke 90.40 mm
Compression Ratio 16.5:1
Firing Order 1-3-4-2
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection
Aspiration Turbocharged
Turbocharger Variable Geometry Turbocharger
Intercooler Yes
Maximum RPM 4,500 rpm
Max Torque RPM 1,750 rpm
Valve Train DOHC
Timing Drive Belt
Timing belt replacement interval 120,000 km
Block Material Cast Iron
Head Material Aluminum
Lubrication System Wet sump
Cooling System Liquid cooling

Additional Information

Engine Family Fiat JTD engine family
Manufacturing Plant Pratola Serra, Italy

Maintenance

Engine Oil Capacity 4.6 L (with filter: 5 L)
Recommended Viscosity 5W-30
Oil Standard ACEA C2
Recommended Brands Selenia, Castrol, Mobil
Oil Change Interval 20 000 km or 12 mo
Oil Filter 71754246
Air Filter 71754247
Replace every 60 000 km
Fuel filter 71754248
Cabin Filter 71754249
Spark Plugs
Coolant Capacity 7 L
Coolant Type G12 (Paraflu)
Coolant Change Interval 240 000 km
Thermostat Opening Temperature 88°C
Operating Temperature 90°C
Max Operating Temperature 110°C
Critical Temperature 120°C
Annual Maintenance Cost 600-900 USD

Reliability

Reliability rating: 7/10

Expected lifespan: 250 000 km

Common problems

Problem Severity Mileage Repair cost
EGR valve clogging Medium 80000-120000 km $300-500
DPF clogging High 100000-150000 km $800-1200

Known defects

  • Turbocharger actuator issues
  • Oil cooler leaks

Warranty extensions

  • Extended warranty for EGR and DPF issues in some markets

Tuning potential

Tuning potential: Medium | Max. safe power: 220 hp

Stage Power Torque Method Cost
Stage 1 150 hp 380 Nm ECU remap only
Reliability impact: Minimal
$400
Stage 2 180 hp 420 Nm ECU, Downpipe, Intake
Required: Upgraded intercooler, ECU remap
Reliability impact: Low
$1500
Stage 3 210 hp 470 Nm -
Required: Bigger turbo, Upgraded fuel system
Reliability impact: Medium
$4000

Popular modifications

Tuning limitations

  • Stock clutch may not handle torque above 400Nm
  • DPF removal not recommended due to emissions regulations

Cars with the JTD 1956 engine

This engine was fitted to 2 models

Photo Brand Model Generation Production years
No photo
Alfa Romeo 146 146 1994 - 2001
No photo
Fiat Croma Croma 2005 - 2011

All modifications (3)

Vehicle Generation Modification Power Gearbox Drive
Alfa Romeo 146 146 2.0 JTD 136 л.с. 6-МКП 2WD 136 hp 6-МКП 2WD
Fiat Croma Croma 2.0 JTD 140 л.с. 6-МКП 2WD 140 hp 6-МКП 2WD
Fiat Croma Croma 2.0 JTD 140 л.с. 7-DSG 2WD 140 hp 7-DSG 2WD

Interesting Facts

  • The JTD 1956 was one of the first engines to feature a variable geometry turbocharger in its class.
  • It was praised for its balance of performance and fuel efficiency.

Applications

Total produced: unknown

Vehicle Generation Years Power Markets
Alfa Romeo Giulietta 940 2010-2020 120hp/150hp Europe, Asia
Alfa Romeo 159 939 2005-2011 150hp/170hp Europe

Compatible transmissions: 6-speed Manual, 6-speed Automatic

Drive types: FWD

Fuel Economy

Fuel Type Diesel
Consumption (City) 7 L/100km
Consumption (Highway) 4.5 L/100km
Consumption (Combined) 5.5 L/100km
Real Consumption 6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L
Range 1,090 km
Cost per 100 km 8-10 USD

Emissions Standards

Emission Standard Euro 5
CO₂ Emissions 145 g/km
Particulate Filter (DPF) Present
Regeneration every 100,000 km
AdBlue Not Required

Awards and Recognition

  • Engine of the Year (2006) — 1.8L to 2.0L

Comparison with competitors

Engine Brand Displacement Power Torque
TDI 1968 Volkswagen 1,968 cc 150 hp 340 Nm
dCi 1995 Renault 1,995 cc 160 hp 380 Nm

Pros

  • Good fuel economy
  • Strong mid-range torque
  • Reliable under normal conditions

Cons

  • DPF and EGR issues
  • Higher maintenance costs compared to some competitors