K9K 652 Renault K9K 652

Компактний і економічний дизельний двигун, популярний у багатьох моделях Renault.

Brand: Renault Type: Diesel Configuration: Inline-4 Production Years: 2005 - 2018 Production: Flins, France
81 Brand engines
4 Modifications

Technical Specifications

Engine Displacement 1.5 L (1,461 cc)
Configuration Inline-4
Number of Cylinders 4
Valves per Cylinder 8
Power 75 - 110 л.с.
Torque 180 - 240 Н*м
Cylinder Bore 76.00 mm
Piston Stroke 80.50 mm
Compression Ratio 19.5:1
Firing Order 1-3-4-2
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection
Aspiration Turbocharged
Turbocharger Garrett GT1544V
Intercooler Yes
Maximum RPM 4,000 rpm
Max Torque RPM 1,750 rpm
Valve Train DOHC
Timing Drive Belt
Timing belt replacement interval 120,000 km
Block Material Cast Iron
Head Material Aluminum
Engine Weight 150 kg
Dimensions (L×W×H) 600 × 500 × 700 mm
Lubrication System Pressure lubrication
Cooling System Liquid cooling

Additional Information

Engine Family Renault K9K series
Manufacturing Plant Flins, France
Predecessor null
Successor null

Maintenance

Engine Oil Capacity 5 L (with filter: 5.5 L)
Recommended Viscosity 5W-30, 5W-40
Oil Standard ACEA C3, API SN
Recommended Brands Total Quartz, Castrol Edge, Mobil 1
Oil Change Interval 15 000 km or 12 mo
Oil Filter 7701471520
Air Filter 165462258R
Replace every 60 000 km
Fuel filter 164008868R
Cabin Filter null
Spark Plugs
Coolant Capacity 7 L
Coolant Type G12 (Renault Coolant)
Coolant Change Interval 240 000 km
Thermostat Opening Temperature 88°C
Operating Temperature 90°C
Max Operating Temperature 120°C
Critical Temperature 130°C
Annual Maintenance Cost 500-800 USD

Reliability

Reliability rating: 8/10

Expected lifespan: 300 000 km

Common problems

Problem Severity Mileage Repair cost
EGR valve failure Medium 100000-150000 km $300-500
Turbocharger failure High 150000-200000 km $1000-1500

Known defects

  • Early models had issues with fuel injectors
  • Potential oil leaks from turbocharger

Warranty extensions

  • Renault offers extended warranty options for up to 5 years

Tuning potential

Tuning potential: Medium | Max. safe power: 140 hp

Stage Power Torque Method Cost
Stage 1 90 hp 210 Nm ECU remap only
Reliability impact: Minimal
$400
Stage 2 115 hp 250 Nm ECU, Downpipe
Required: Upgraded intercooler, ECU remap
Reliability impact: Low
$1200
Stage 3 130 hp 280 Nm -
Required: Bigger turbo, Upgraded fuel system
Reliability impact: Medium
$2500

Popular modifications

Tuning limitations

  • Stock turbo limits at ~130hp
  • Cooling system upgrades recommended for high power

Cars with the K9K 652 engine

This engine was fitted to 4 models

Photo Brand Model Generation Production years
No photo
Renault Clio Clio II 1998 - 2005
No photo
Renault Kangoo Kangoo 1998 - 2008
No photo
Renault Logan Logan 2004 - 2012
No photo
Renault Lutecia Lutecia II (B/C54) 1996 - 2006

All modifications (4)

Vehicle Generation Modification Power Gearbox Drive
Renault Clio Clio II 1.5 dCi 65 л.с. 5-МКП 2WD 65 hp 5-МКП 2WD
Renault Kangoo Kangoo 1.5 dCi 65 л.с. 5-МКП 2WD 65 hp 5-МКП 2WD
Renault Logan Logan 1.5 dCi 65 л.с. 5-МКП 2WD 65 hp 5-МКП 2WD
Renault Lutecia Lutecia II (B/C54) 1.5 dCi 65 л.с. 5-МКП 2WD 65 hp 5-МКП 2WD

Interesting Facts

  • The K9K engine family is known for its fuel efficiency and reliability.
  • Used in various Renault models across Europe.

Applications

Total produced: null

Vehicle Generation Years Power Markets
Renault Megane II 2005-2010 75hp/110hp Europe
Renault Scenic II 2005-2016 75hp/110hp Europe

Compatible transmissions: 6-speed Manual, 6-speed Automatic

Drive types: FWD

Fuel Economy

Fuel Type Diesel
Consumption (City) 6.5 L/100km
Consumption (Highway) 4.5 L/100km
Consumption (Combined) 5.5 L/100km
Real Consumption 6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L
Range 909 km
Cost per 100 km 8-10 USD

Emissions Standards

Emission Standard Euro 5
CO₂ Emissions 140 g/km
Particulate Filter (DPF) Present
Regeneration every 150,000 km
AdBlue Not Required

Comparison with competitors

Engine Brand Displacement Power Torque
1.5 dCi Nissan 1,461 cc 110 hp 240 Nm

Pros

  • Good fuel economy
  • Robust design
  • Widely used in multiple models

Cons

  • Potential turbo issues
  • EGR valve failures in some models