M9T 200 Renault M9T 200

Модульний 4-циліндровий двигун з TwinPower Turbo, що забезпечує високу потужність та ефективність. Підходить для різних умов експлуатації, з можливістю тюнінгу для підвищення продуктивності.

Brand: Renault Type: Diesel Configuration: Inline-4 Production Years: 2011 - 2019 Production: Douai, France
81 Brand engines
2 Modifications

Technical Specifications

Engine Displacement 2.0 L (1,998 cc)
Configuration Inline-4
Number of Cylinders 4
Valves per Cylinder 4
Power 140 - 200 л.с.
Torque 320 - 380 Н*м
Cylinder Bore 85.00 mm
Piston Stroke 88.00 mm
Compression Ratio 15.0:1
Firing Order 1-3-4-2
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection
Aspiration Turbocharged
Turbocharger Variable Geometry Turbocharger
Intercooler Yes
Maximum RPM 4,000 rpm
Max Torque RPM 1,750 rpm
Valve Train DOHC
Timing Drive Chain
Timing Chain Replacement 300000 or as needed
Block Material Cast Iron
Head Material Aluminum
Engine Weight 180 kg
Dimensions (L×W×H) 600 × 500 × 700 mm
Lubrication System Pressure lubrication
Cooling System Liquid cooling

Additional Information

Engine Family Renault M9T series
Manufacturing Plant Douai, France
Successor M9T 225

Maintenance

Engine Oil Capacity 5.5 L (with filter: 6 L)
Recommended Viscosity 5W-30, 5W-40
Oil Standard ACEA C3, API SN
Recommended Brands Total Quartz, Castrol Edge, Mobil 1
Oil Change Interval 15 000 km or 12 mo
Oil Filter 154007368R
Air Filter 165460028R
Replace every 60 000 km
Fuel filter 164008828R
Cabin Filter null
Spark Plugs
Coolant Capacity 7 L
Coolant Type G12/G13 (Renault Coolant)
Coolant Change Interval 240 000 km
Thermostat Opening Temperature 90°C
Operating Temperature 90°C
Max Operating Temperature 120°C
Critical Temperature 130°C
Annual Maintenance Cost 600-900 USD

Reliability

Reliability rating: 8/10

Expected lifespan: 300 000 km

Common problems

Problem Severity Mileage Repair cost
Turbocharger failure Medium 150000-200000 km $800-1500
EGR valve clogging Low 100000-150000 km $200-400

Known defects

  • Oil leaks from turbocharger
  • Injector failures in early models

Warranty extensions

  • Renault offers extended warranty for engine components up to 5 years/100000 miles

Tuning potential

Tuning potential: Medium | Max. safe power: 300 hp

Stage Power Torque Method Cost
Stage 1 180 hp 420 Nm ECU remap only
Reliability impact: Minimal
$400
Stage 2 220 hp 480 Nm ECU, Downpipe, Intake
Required: Upgraded intercooler, ECU remap
Reliability impact: Low
$1200
Stage 3 250 hp 550 Nm Hybrid Turbo, Injectors
Required: Bigger turbo, Upgraded fuel system
Reliability impact: Medium
$2500

Popular modifications

Tuning limitations

  • Turbo limitations at high power levels
  • Increased wear on engine components

Cars with the M9T 200 engine

This engine was fitted to 1 model

Photo Brand Model Generation Production years
No photo
Renault Trafic Trafic III 2014 - present

All modifications (2)

Vehicle Generation Modification Power Gearbox Drive
Renault Trafic Trafic III E-Tech 200 л.с. 7-DSG 2WD 200 hp 7-DSG 2WD
Renault Trafic Trafic III E-Tech 200 л.с. 7-DSG 4x4 200 hp 7-DSG 4x4

Interesting Facts

  • The M9T engine is known for its fuel efficiency and low emissions.
  • It features advanced turbocharging technology for better performance.

Applications

Total produced: null

Vehicle Generation Years Power Markets
Renault Master III 2011-2019 140hp/200hp Europe
Renault Trafic III 2014-2019 140hp/200hp Europe

Compatible transmissions: 6-speed Manual, 6-speed Automatic

Drive types: FWD, RWD

Fuel Economy

Fuel Type Diesel
Consumption (City) 8 L/100km
Consumption (Highway) 5.5 L/100km
Consumption (Combined) 6.5 L/100km
Real Consumption 7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L
Range 923 km
Cost per 100 km 8-12 USD

Emissions Standards

Emission Standard Euro 6
CO₂ Emissions 150 g/km
Particulate Filter (DPF) Present
Regeneration every 30,000 km
AdBlue Required
Consumption: 1 L/1000km

Comparison with competitors

Engine Brand Displacement Power Torque
2.0 TDCi Ford 1,997 cc 170 hp 400 Nm
OM651 Mercedes-Benz 2,143 cc 163 hp 400 Nm

Pros

  • Better fuel economy compared to competitors
  • Lower emissions

Cons

  • Potential turbo issues
  • Higher maintenance costs than naturally aspirated engines