M9T 220 Renault M9T 220

Модульний 4-циліндровий двигун з TwinPower Turbo, що забезпечує високу потужність та ефективність.

Brand: Renault Type: Diesel Configuration: Inline-4 Production Years: 2015 - теперішній час Production: Douai, France
81 Brand engines
2 Modifications

Technical Specifications

Engine Displacement 2.0 L (1,998 cc)
Configuration Inline-4
Number of Cylinders 4
Valves per Cylinder 4
Power 150 - 220 л.с.
Torque 350 - 400 Н*м
Cylinder Bore 85.00 mm
Piston Stroke 88.00 mm
Compression Ratio 15.0:1
Firing Order 1-3-4-2
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection
Aspiration Turbocharged
Turbocharger Garrett GTB
Intercooler Yes
Maximum RPM 4,000 rpm
Max Torque RPM 1,500 rpm
Valve Train DOHC
Timing Drive Chain
Timing Chain Replacement 200000 or as needed
Block Material Cast Iron
Head Material Aluminum
Engine Weight 180 kg
Dimensions (L×W×H) 600 × 500 × 700 mm
Lubrication System Pressure lubrication
Cooling System Liquid cooling

Additional Information

Engine Family Renault M9T series
Manufacturing Plant Douai, France

Maintenance

Engine Oil Capacity 5.5 L (with filter: 6 L)
Recommended Viscosity 5W-30, 5W-40
Oil Standard ACEA C3, API SN
Recommended Brands Total Quartz, Mobil 1, Castrol Edge
Oil Change Interval 15 000 km or 12 mo
Oil Filter 152080078R
Air Filter 165463918R
Replace every 60 000 km
Fuel filter 164007358R
Spark Plugs
Coolant Capacity 8 L
Coolant Type G12/G13 (Renault Coolant)
Coolant Change Interval 240 000 km
Thermostat Opening Temperature 90°C
Operating Temperature 90°C
Max Operating Temperature 120°C
Critical Temperature 130°C
Annual Maintenance Cost 600-900 USD

Reliability

Reliability rating: 8/10

Expected lifespan: 300 000 km

Common problems

Problem Severity Mileage Repair cost
Turbocharger failure Medium 150000-200000 km $800-1500
EGR valve clogging Low 100000-150000 km $300-500

Known defects

  • Some early models had issues with fuel injectors
  • Potential oil leaks from turbocharger

Warranty extensions

  • Renault offers extended warranty options for up to 5 years

Tuning potential

Tuning potential: Medium | Max. safe power: 350 hp

Stage Power Torque Method Cost
Stage 1 240 hp 450 Nm ECU remap only
Reliability impact: Minimal
$600
Stage 2 280 hp 500 Nm ECU, Downpipe, Intake
Required: Upgraded intercooler, ECU remap
Reliability impact: Low
$1500
Stage 3 320 hp 600 Nm Hybrid Turbo, Injectors
Required: Bigger turbo, Forged internals, Upgraded fuel system
Reliability impact: Medium
$3500

Popular modifications

Tuning limitations

  • Stock turbo limits at ~300hp
  • Cooling system needs upgrades for high power applications

Cars with the M9T 220 engine

This engine was fitted to 1 model

Photo Brand Model Generation Production years
No photo
Renault Trafic Trafic III 2014 - present

All modifications (2)

Vehicle Generation Modification Power Gearbox Drive
Renault Trafic Trafic III E-Tech 220 л.с. 7-DSG 2WD 220 hp 7-DSG 2WD
Renault Trafic Trafic III E-Tech 220 л.с. 7-DSG 4x4 220 hp 7-DSG 4x4

Interesting Facts

  • The M9T engine is known for its fuel efficiency and low emissions.
  • It features a variable geometry turbocharger for better performance.

Applications

Vehicle Generation Years Power Markets
Renault Master III 2015-present 150hp/220hp Europe, Asia
Renault Trafic III 2015-present 150hp/220hp Europe, Asia

Compatible transmissions: 6-speed Manual, 6-speed Automatic

Drive types: FWD, RWD

Fuel Economy

Fuel Type Diesel
Consumption (City) 8 L/100km
Consumption (Highway) 5.5 L/100km
Consumption (Combined) 6.5 L/100km
Real Consumption 7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L
Range 1,077 km
Cost per 100 km 8-12 USD

Emissions Standards

Emission Standard Euro 6
CO₂ Emissions 150 g/km
Particulate Filter (DPF) Present
Regeneration every 30,000 km
AdBlue Required
Consumption: 1 L/1000km

Comparison with competitors

Engine Brand Displacement Power Torque
2.0 TDCi Ford 1,997 cc 170 hp 400 Nm
OM651 Mercedes-Benz 2,143 cc 163 hp 400 Nm

Pros

  • Good balance of power and fuel economy
  • Reliable and durable design

Cons

  • Turbocharger issues in some models
  • Higher maintenance costs compared to naturally aspirated engines