JTS 2.2 185 HP Alfa Romeo JTS 2.2 185 HP
Атмосферний 4-циліндровий двигун з безпосереднім впорскуванням, відомий своєю потужністю та вимогливістю до обслуговування.
48
Brand engines
2
Modifications
Technical Specifications
| Engine Displacement | 2.2 L (2,198 cc) |
| Configuration | Inline-4 |
| Number of Cylinders | 4 |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 |
| Power | 185 л.с. |
| Torque | 230 Н*м |
| Cylinder Bore | 86.00 mm |
| Piston Stroke | 94.60 mm |
| Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 |
| Firing Order | 1-3-4-2 |
| Fuel System | Direct Injection |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated |
| Intercooler | No |
| Maximum RPM | 6,500 rpm |
| Max Torque RPM | 4,500 rpm |
| Valve Train | DOHC |
| Timing Drive | Chain |
| Timing Chain Replacement | 250000 or as needed |
| Block Material | Aluminum |
| Head Material | Aluminum |
| Lubrication System | Wet sump |
| Cooling System | Liquid cooling |
Additional Information
| Engine Family | JTS |
| Manufacturing Plant | Pratola Serra, Italy |
Maintenance
| Engine Oil Capacity | 5.4 L (with filter: 5.8 L) |
| Recommended Viscosity | 5W-40 |
| Oil Standard | ACEA C3 |
| Recommended Brands | Selenia, Castrol, Mobil 1 |
| Oil Change Interval | 15 000 km or 12 mo |
| Oil Filter | 71736161 |
| Air Filter |
71754203
Replace every 60 000 km |
| Cabin Filter | 71753794 |
| Spark Plugs |
Type: Iridium Part number: 55210685Gap: 0.9 mm Quantity: 4 pcs Replace every 60 000 km |
| Coolant Capacity | 8.5 L |
| Coolant Type | G12 (Paraflu) |
| Coolant Change Interval | 240 000 km |
| Thermostat Opening Temperature | 88°C |
| Operating Temperature | 90°C |
| Max Operating Temperature | 110°C |
| Critical Temperature | 120°C |
| Annual Maintenance Cost | 700-1000 USD |
Reliability
Expected lifespan: 250 000 km
Common problems
| Problem | Severity | Mileage | Repair cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timing chain tensioner wear | Medium | 100000-150000 km | $1000-1500 |
| Oil consumption | Medium | 80000-120000 km | $500-1000 |
Known defects
- High oil consumption in some units
Tuning potential
Tuning potential: Medium | Max. safe power: 220 hp
| Stage | Power | Torque | Method | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 | 200 hp | 250 Nm |
ECU remap only Reliability impact: Minimal |
$500 |
| Stage 2 | 220 hp | 270 Nm |
ECU, Exhaust Required: Exhaust system upgrade, ECU remap Reliability impact: Low |
$1500 |
Popular modifications
- ECU remap
- Cold air intake
- Performance exhaust
Tuning limitations
- Limited by naturally aspirated configuration
Cars with the JTS 2.2 185 HP engine
This engine was fitted to 1 model
| Photo | Brand | Model | Generation | Production years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
No photo
|
Alfa Romeo | Brera | Brera | 2005 - 2010 |
All modifications (2)
| Vehicle | Generation | Modification | Power | Gearbox | Drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo Brera | Brera | 2.2 JTS 185 л.с. 6-МКП 2WD | 185 hp | 6-МКП | 2WD |
| Alfa Romeo Brera | Brera | 2.2 JTS 185 л.с. 6-Автомат 2WD | 185 hp | 6-Автомат | 2WD |
Interesting Facts
- The JTS 2.2 was one of the first Alfa Romeo engines to feature direct injection technology.
Applications
| Vehicle | Generation | Years | Power | Markets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo 159 | 939 | 2005-2010 | 185hp | Europe, Australia |
| Alfa Romeo Brera | 939 | 2005-2010 | 185hp | Europe |
Compatible transmissions: 6-speed Manual, 6-speed Automatic
Drive types: FWD
Fuel Economy
| Fuel Type | Petrol 95 |
| Octane Rating | Minimum: 95 | Recommended: 98 |
| Consumption (City) | 12 L/100km |
| Consumption (Highway) | 7 L/100km |
| Consumption (Combined) | 9 L/100km |
| Real Consumption | 10.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L |
| Range | 778 km |
| Cost per 100 km | 15-20 USD |
Emissions Standards
| Emission Standard | Euro 4 |
| CO₂ Emissions | 214 g/km |
| Particulate Filter (DPF) | Absent |
| AdBlue | Not Required |
Comparison with competitors
| Engine | Brand | Displacement | Power | Torque |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSI 2.0 | Volkswagen | 1,984 cc | 200 hp | 280 Nm |
| MZR 2.3 | Mazda | 2,261 cc | 166 hp | 207 Nm |
Pros
- Direct injection for improved efficiency
- Good power output for a naturally aspirated engine
Cons
- Higher fuel consumption compared to competitors
- Known for oil consumption issues