F154B1 Ferrari F154B1

Потужний 2.9-літровий V6 Bi-Turbo двигун, розроблений для високих показників продуктивності та динаміки.

Brand: Ferrari Type: Petrol Configuration: V6 Production Years: 2016 - теперішній час Production: Termoli, Italy
15 Brand engines
1 Modifications

Technical Specifications

Engine Displacement 2.9 L (2,891 cc)
Configuration V6
Number of Cylinders 6
Valves per Cylinder 4
Power 510 - 540 л.с.
Torque 600 Н*м
Cylinder Bore 86.50 mm
Piston Stroke 82.00 mm
Compression Ratio 9.3:1
Firing Order 1-6-3-4-2-5
Fuel System Direct Injection
Aspiration Bi-Turbocharged
Turbocharger Two single-scroll turbochargers
Intercooler Yes
Maximum RPM 6,500 rpm
Max Torque RPM 2,500 rpm
Valve Train DOHC
Timing Drive Chain
Timing Chain Replacement 250000 or as needed
Block Material Aluminum
Head Material Aluminum
Engine Weight 175 kg
Dimensions (L×W×H) null mm
Lubrication System Dry sump
Cooling System Liquid cooling

Additional Information

Engine Family Ferrari F154 engine family
Manufacturing Plant Termoli, Italy

Maintenance

Engine Oil Capacity 7 L (with filter: 7.5 L)
Recommended Viscosity 5W-40
Oil Standard ACEA C3
Recommended Brands Selenia, Castrol Edge, Mobil 1
Oil Change Interval 15 000 km or 12 mo
Oil Filter 71754276
Air Filter 50538424
Replace every 60 000 km
Cabin Filter 50538425
Spark Plugs Type: Iridium
Part number: 55210685
Gap: 0.8 mm
Quantity: 6 pcs
Replace every 60 000 km
Coolant Capacity 10.5 L
Coolant Type G12++ (Paraflu)
Coolant Change Interval 240 000 km
Thermostat Opening Temperature 88°C
Operating Temperature 90°C
Max Operating Temperature 120°C
Critical Temperature 130°C
Annual Maintenance Cost 1000-1500 USD

Reliability

Reliability rating: 7/10

Expected lifespan: 250 000 km

Common problems

Problem Severity Mileage Repair cost
Turbocharger failure High 100000-150000 km $3000-5000
Oil leaks Medium 80000-120000 km $500-1000

Known defects

  • Early models had issues with turbocharger reliability

Warranty extensions

  • Extended warranty available for turbocharger issues

Tuning potential

Tuning potential: High | Max. safe power: 800 hp

Stage Power Torque Method Cost
Stage 1 580 hp 700 Nm ECU remap only
Reliability impact: Minimal
$1000
Stage 2 650 hp 800 Nm ECU, Exhaust, Intake
Required: Upgraded intercoolers, Downpipes, ECU remap
Reliability impact: Low
$5000
Stage 3 750 hp 900 Nm -
Required: Bigger turbos, Forged internals, Upgraded fuel system
Reliability impact: Medium-High
$15000

Popular modifications

Tuning limitations

  • Stock internals limit power above 700hp
  • Cooling system upgrades required for track use

Cars with the F154B1 engine

This engine was fitted to 1 model

Photo Brand Model Generation Production years
No photo
Alfa Romeo Giulia Giulia 2016 - present

All modifications (1)

Vehicle Generation Modification Power Gearbox Drive
Alfa Romeo Giulia Giulia 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo 505 hp 8-АКП AWD

Interesting Facts

  • Developed with input from Ferrari engineers
  • Features a 90-degree V6 configuration derived from Ferrari's V8 engines

Applications

Total produced: unknown

Vehicle Generation Years Power Markets
Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio 952 2016-present 510hp Europe, USA, Asia
Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio 949 2017-present 510hp Europe, USA, Asia

Compatible transmissions: 8-speed Automatic

Drive types: RWD, AWD

Fuel Economy

Fuel Type Petrol 98
Octane Rating Minimum: 95 | Recommended: 98
Consumption (City) 11.8 L/100km
Consumption (Highway) 7.5 L/100km
Consumption (Combined) 9.5 L/100km
Real Consumption 10.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L
Range 610 km
Cost per 100 km 15-20 USD

Emissions Standards

Emission Standard Euro 6
CO₂ Emissions 198 g/km
Particulate Filter (DPF) Absent
AdBlue Not Required

Awards and Recognition

  • Engine of the Year (2016) — 2.5L to 3.0L

Comparison with competitors

Engine Brand Displacement Power Torque
S55 BMW 2,979 cc 425 hp 550 Nm
M177 Mercedes-AMG 3,982 cc 503 hp 700 Nm

Pros

  • High power output for its displacement
  • Ferrari engineering influence
  • Lightweight aluminum construction

Cons

  • Higher maintenance costs
  • Turbocharger reliability issues in early models