Ford 2.7 EcoBoost Ford 2.7 EcoBoost

Компактний і потужний V6 двигун з подвійним турбонаддувом, що забезпечує високу продуктивність і ефективність.

Brand: Lincoln Type: Petrol Configuration: V6 Production Years: 2014 - теперішній час Production: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
17 Brand engines
1 Modifications

Technical Specifications

Engine Displacement 2.7 L (2,670 cc)
Configuration V6
Number of Cylinders 6
Valves per Cylinder 4
Power 335 - 400 л.с.
Torque 400 - 542 Н*м
Cylinder Bore 86.00 mm
Piston Stroke 86.00 mm
Compression Ratio 10.0:1
Firing Order 1-2-3-4-5-6
Fuel System Direct Injection
Aspiration Turbocharged
Turbocharger Twin Turbochargers
Intercooler Yes
Maximum RPM 6,000 rpm
Max Torque RPM 3,000 rpm
Valve Train DOHC
Timing Drive Chain
Timing Chain Replacement 250000 or as needed
Block Material Aluminum
Head Material Aluminum
Engine Weight 180 kg
Dimensions (L×W×H) 600 × 500 × 500 mm
Lubrication System Pressure lubrication
Cooling System Liquid cooling

Additional Information

Engine Family Ford EcoBoost
Manufacturing Plant Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Maintenance

Engine Oil Capacity 5.7 L (with filter: 6 L)
Recommended Viscosity 5W-30
Oil Standard API SN, ILSAC GF-5
Recommended Brands Motorcraft, Mobil 1, Castrol
Oil Change Interval 8 000 km or 6 mo
Oil Filter FL-500S
Air Filter FA-1886
Replace every 30 000 km
Cabin Filter FC-2000
Spark Plugs Type: Iridium
Part number: SP-534
Gap: 1.1 mm
Quantity: 6 pcs
Replace every 100 000 km
Coolant Capacity 8 L
Coolant Type G05 (Motorcraft)
Coolant Change Interval 240 000 km
Thermostat Opening Temperature 90°C
Operating Temperature 95°C
Max Operating Temperature 120°C
Critical Temperature 130°C
Annual Maintenance Cost 600-900 USD

Reliability

Reliability rating: 8/10

Expected lifespan: 300 000 km

Common problems

Problem Severity Mileage Repair cost
Timing chain tensioner issues Medium 100000-150000 km $1000-1500
Oil leaks from the turbo Medium 80000-120000 km $800-1200

Known defects

  • Some early models had issues with oil consumption
  • Turbocharger wastegate rattle

Warranty extensions

  • Ford offers extended warranty options for engine-related issues

Tuning potential

Tuning potential: High | Max. safe power: 550 hp

Stage Power Torque Method Cost
Stage 1 400 hp 600 Nm ECU remap only
Reliability impact: Minimal
$600
Stage 2 450 hp 650 Nm ECU, Downpipe, Intake
Required: Upgraded intercooler, ECU remap
Reliability impact: Low
$1500
Stage 3 500 hp 700 Nm -
Required: Bigger turbo, Upgraded fuel system, ECU remap
Reliability impact: Medium
$3000

Popular modifications

Tuning limitations

  • Stock fuel system limits at ~450hp
  • Cooling system needs upgrades for high power applications

Cars with the Ford 2.7 EcoBoost engine

This engine was fitted to 1 model

Photo Brand Model Generation Production years
No photo
Lincoln MKX MKX 2006 - 2015

All modifications (1)

Vehicle Generation Modification Power Gearbox Drive
Lincoln MKX MKX 2.7L V6 335 л.с. 6-Автомат 4x4 335 hp 6-Автомат 4x4

Interesting Facts

  • The 2.7 EcoBoost engine is known for its compact design and high power output.
  • It features a unique aluminum block and twin turbochargers for improved efficiency.

Applications

Vehicle Generation Years Power Markets
Lincoln MKX 2016-2020 335hp/400hp North America
Ford F-150 2015-present 325hp/400hp North America

Compatible transmissions: 6-speed Automatic, 10-speed Automatic

Drive types: RWD, AWD

Fuel Economy

Fuel Type Petrol 91
Octane Rating Minimum: 87 | Recommended: 91
Consumption (City) 12 L/100km
Consumption (Highway) 8 L/100km
Consumption (Combined) 10 L/100km
Real Consumption 11 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L
Range 700 km
Cost per 100 km 15-20 USD

Emissions Standards

Emission Standard Euro 6
CO₂ Emissions 220 g/km
Particulate Filter (DPF) Present
Regeneration every 150,000 km
AdBlue Not Required

Awards and Recognition

  • Ward's 10 Best Engines (2015) — Best Engine

Comparison with competitors

Engine Brand Displacement Power Torque
GM 2.7L Turbo General Motors 2,700 cc 310 hp 420 Nm
Toyota 3.5L V6 Toyota 3,500 cc 278 hp 400 Nm

Pros

  • Higher power output compared to competitors.
  • Better fuel efficiency due to turbocharging.

Cons

  • Potential turbocharger issues.
  • Higher complexity compared to naturally aspirated engines.