5-cylinder TDCi 3.2L Ford 3.2L Duratorq TDCi

Модульний 5-циліндровий дизельний двигун з турбонаддувом, відомий своєю потужністю та надійністю.

Brand: Ford Type: Diesel Configuration: Inline-5 Production Years: 2006 - 2016 Production: Dagenham, United Kingdom
138 Brand engines
2 Modifications

Technical Specifications

Engine Displacement 3.2 L (3,196 cc)
Configuration Inline-5
Number of Cylinders 5
Valves per Cylinder 4
Power 197 - 200 л.с.
Torque 470 Н*м
Cylinder Bore 92.00 mm
Piston Stroke 100.00 mm
Compression Ratio 17.5:1
Firing Order 1-2-4-5-3
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection
Aspiration Turbocharged
Turbocharger Variable Geometry Turbocharger
Intercooler Yes
Maximum RPM 3,500 rpm
Max Torque RPM 1,500 rpm
Valve Train DOHC
Timing Drive Chain
Timing Chain Replacement 250000 or as needed
Block Material Cast Iron
Head Material Aluminum
Engine Weight 210 kg
Dimensions (L×W×H) 600 × 600 × 700 mm
Lubrication System Pressure lubrication
Cooling System Liquid cooling

Additional Information

Engine Family Ford Duratorq
Manufacturing Plant Dagenham, United Kingdom
Successor 2.0L EcoBlue

Maintenance

Engine Oil Capacity 7 L (with filter: 7.5 L)
Recommended Viscosity 5W-30
Oil Standard ACEA C3
Recommended Brands Ford Motorcraft, Castrol, Mobil 1
Oil Change Interval 15 000 km or 12 mo
Oil Filter 1517060
Air Filter 1770060
Replace every 60 000 km
Fuel filter 1770061
Spark Plugs
Coolant Capacity 8 L
Coolant Type G12 (Ford Motorcraft)
Coolant Change Interval 240 000 km
Thermostat Opening Temperature 88°C
Operating Temperature 90°C
Max Operating Temperature 120°C
Critical Temperature 130°C
Annual Maintenance Cost 600-900 USD

Reliability

Reliability rating: 8/10

Expected lifespan: 300 000 km

Common problems

Problem Severity Mileage Repair cost
EGR valve failure Medium 100000-150000 km $500-800
Turbocharger failure High 150000-200000 km $1500-2500

Known defects

  • Early models had issues with fuel injectors
  • Some units experienced oil leaks

Warranty extensions

  • Ford extended warranty for engine issues up to 5 years/100000 miles

Tuning potential

Tuning potential: Medium | Max. safe power: 320 hp

Stage Power Torque Method Cost
Stage 1 230 hp 500 Nm ECU remap only
Reliability impact: Minimal
$600
Stage 2 270 hp 550 Nm ECU, Downpipe, Intake
Required: Upgraded intercooler, ECU remap
Reliability impact: Low
$1500
Stage 3 300 hp 600 Nm -
Required: Bigger turbo, Forged internals, ECU remap
Reliability impact: Medium
$3500

Popular modifications

Tuning limitations

  • Turbo limitations above 300hp
  • Cooling system needs upgrades for high-performance use

Cars with the 5-cylinder TDCi 3.2L engine

This engine was fitted to 1 model

Photo Brand Model Generation Production years
No photo
Ford Ranger Ranger 2006 - 2011

All modifications (2)

Vehicle Generation Modification Power Gearbox Drive
Ford Ranger Ranger 3.2L TDCi 200 л.с. 6-МКП 4x4 200 hp 6-МКП 4x4
Ford Ranger Ranger 3.2L TDCi 200 л.с. 6-Автомат 4x4 200 hp 6-Автомат 4x4

Interesting Facts

  • This engine is known for its durability and high torque output.
  • It was widely used in commercial vehicles due to its reliability.

Applications

Total produced: 200000+

Vehicle Generation Years Power Markets
Ford Ranger T6 2011-2016 200hp Europe, Australia, Asia
Ford Everest T6 2015-2016 200hp Australia, Asia

Compatible transmissions: 6-speed Manual, 6-speed Automatic

Drive types: RWD, AWD

Fuel Economy

Fuel Type Diesel
Consumption (City) 10.5 L/100km
Consumption (Highway) 7.5 L/100km
Consumption (Combined) 8.9 L/100km
Real Consumption 9.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L
Range 898 km
Cost per 100 km 10-15 USD

Emissions Standards

Emission Standard Euro 5
CO₂ Emissions 199 g/km
Particulate Filter (DPF) Present
Regeneration every 30,000 km
AdBlue Not Required

Comparison with competitors

Engine Brand Displacement Power Torque
2.2L Duratorq TDCi Ford 2,198 cc 150 hp 385 Nm
2.5L D4D Toyota 2,494 cc 144 hp 343 Nm

Pros

  • Higher torque output compared to competitors
  • Better fuel economy in real-world conditions

Cons

  • Heavier than some competitors
  • Higher maintenance costs due to complexity