Ford EcoBoost 2.7 Ford EcoBoost 2.7L V6

Компактний V6 двигун з подвійним турбонаддувом, що забезпечує високу потужність і ефективність.

Brand: Ford Type: Petrol Configuration: V6 Production Years: 2014 - теперішній час Production: Flat Rock, Michigan, USA
138 Brand engines
3 Modifications

Technical Specifications

Engine Displacement 2.7 L (2,670 cc)
Configuration V6
Number of Cylinders 6
Valves per Cylinder 4
Power 250 - 325 л.с.
Torque 400 - 475 Н*м
Cylinder Bore 86.00 mm
Piston Stroke 86.00 mm
Compression Ratio 10.0:1
Firing Order 1-2-3-4-5-6
Fuel System Direct Injection
Aspiration Turbocharged
Turbocharger Twin turbochargers
Intercooler Yes
Maximum RPM 6,000 rpm
Max Torque RPM 3,000 rpm
Valve Train DOHC
Timing Drive Chain
Timing Chain Replacement 200000 or as needed
Block Material Aluminum
Head Material Aluminum
Engine Weight 180 kg
Dimensions (L×W×H) 600 × 500 × 600 mm
Lubrication System Pressure lubrication
Cooling System Liquid cooling

Additional Information

Engine Family Ford EcoBoost
Manufacturing Plant Flat Rock, Michigan, USA

Maintenance

Engine Oil Capacity 5.7 L (with filter: 6 L)
Recommended Viscosity 5W-30
Oil Standard API SN, ILSAC GF-5
Recommended Brands Motorcraft, Mobil 1, Castrol
Oil Change Interval 8 000 km or 6 mo
Oil Filter FL-500S
Air Filter FA-1883
Replace every 30 000 km
Spark Plugs Type: Iridium
Part number: SP-534
Gap: 1.1 mm
Quantity: 6 pcs
Replace every 100 000 km
Coolant Capacity 10 L
Coolant Type Ford Premium Cooling System Fluid (Motorcraft)
Coolant Change Interval 160 000 km
Thermostat Opening Temperature 90°C
Operating Temperature 95°C
Max Operating Temperature 120°C
Critical Temperature 130°C
Annual Maintenance Cost 600-900 USD

Reliability

Reliability rating: 8/10

Expected lifespan: 300 000 km

Common problems

Problem Severity Mileage Repair cost
Timing chain issues Medium 150000-200000 km $1000-1500
Oil leaks from the turbocharger Medium 100000-150000 km $800-1200

Known defects

  • Some early models had issues with oil consumption
  • Turbocharger wastegate failures

Warranty extensions

  • Ford offers extended warranties for specific engine components

Tuning potential

Tuning potential: Medium | Max. safe power: 500 hp

Stage Power Torque Method Cost
Stage 1 360 hp 500 Nm ECU remap only
Reliability impact: Minimal
$600
Stage 2 400 hp 550 Nm ECU, Downpipe, Intake
Required: Upgraded intercooler, ECU remap
Reliability impact: Low
$1500
Stage 3 450 hp 600 Nm -
Required: Bigger turbo, Upgraded fuel system
Reliability impact: Medium
$3000

Popular modifications

Tuning limitations

  • Stock turbo limitations
  • Cooling system upgrades needed for high power

Cars with the Ford EcoBoost 2.7 engine

This engine was fitted to 2 models

Photo Brand Model Generation Production years
No photo
Ford F-150 F-150 XIV 2020 - present
No photo
Ford Bronco Basecamp Bronco Basecamp 2025 - 2026

All modifications (3)

Vehicle Generation Modification Power Gearbox Drive
Ford F-150 F-150 XIV 2.7L V6 EcoBoost 325 л.с. 10-Автомат 2WD 325 hp 10-Автомат 2WD
Ford F-150 F-150 XIV 2.7L V6 EcoBoost 325 л.с. 10-Автомат 4x4 325 hp 10-Автомат 4x4
Ford Bronco Basecamp Bronco Basecamp 2.7 EcoBoost 310 л.с. 10-Автомат 4x4 310 hp 10-Автомат 4x4

Interesting Facts

  • The EcoBoost 2.7L V6 was designed to provide a balance of power and fuel efficiency.
  • It features a compact design that allows for better weight distribution in vehicles.

Applications

Vehicle Generation Years Power Markets
Ford F-150 13th 2015-present 250hp/325hp North America
Ford Edge 2nd 2015-present 250hp North America

Compatible transmissions: 6-speed Automatic, 10-speed Automatic

Drive types: RWD, AWD

Fuel Economy

Fuel Type Petrol 87
Octane Rating Minimum: 87 | Recommended: 91
Consumption (City) 12 L/100km
Consumption (Highway) 8 L/100km
Consumption (Combined) 10 L/100km
Real Consumption 11 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L
Range 800 km
Cost per 100 km 15-20 USD

Emissions Standards

Emission Standard Euro 6
CO₂ Emissions 210 g/km
Particulate Filter (DPF) Absent
AdBlue Not Required

Awards and Recognition

  • Ward's 10 Best Engines (2015) — Best Engine

Comparison with competitors

Engine Brand Displacement Power Torque
GM 2.7L I4 Turbo General Motors 2,700 cc 310 hp 420 Nm
Toyota 3.5L V6 Toyota 3,456 cc 278 hp 400 Nm

Pros

  • Higher torque output compared to naturally aspirated engines.
  • Better fuel economy due to turbocharging.

Cons

  • Potential turbocharger issues.
  • More complex engine management system.