Ford: HJBA Ford HJBA

Модульний 4-циліндровий двигун з гібридною технологією, що забезпечує ефективність та потужність.

Brand: Ford Type: Petrol Configuration: Inline-4 Production Years: 2012 - 2020 Production: Bridgend, Wales
138 Brand engines
2 Modifications

Technical Specifications

Engine Displacement 2.0 L (1,498 cc)
Configuration Inline-4
Number of Cylinders 4
Valves per Cylinder 4
Power 120 - 150 л.с.
Torque 170 - 240 Н*м
Cylinder Bore 75.00 mm
Piston Stroke 84.00 mm
Compression Ratio 10.0:1
Firing Order 1-3-4-2
Fuel System Direct Injection
Aspiration Turbocharged
Turbocharger Single twin-scroll turbocharger
Intercooler Yes
Maximum RPM 6,000 rpm
Max Torque RPM 1,500 rpm
Valve Train DOHC
Timing Drive Chain
Timing Chain Replacement null
Block Material Aluminum
Head Material Aluminum
Engine Weight 130 kg
Dimensions (L×W×H) 500 × 600 × 700 mm
Lubrication System Pressure lubrication
Cooling System Liquid cooling

Additional Information

Engine Family Ford EcoBoost
Manufacturing Plant Bridgend, Wales
Predecessor null
Successor null

Maintenance

Engine Oil Capacity 4.5 L (with filter: 5 L)
Recommended Viscosity 5W-30
Oil Standard ACEA A5/B5
Recommended Brands Castrol Edge, Mobil 1, Ford Motorcraft
Oil Change Interval 15 000 km or 12 mo
Oil Filter CV6Z-6731-B
Air Filter CV6Z-9601-A
Replace every 60 000 km
Fuel filter null
Cabin Filter null
Spark Plugs Type: Iridium
Part number: SP-534
Gap: 1 mm
Quantity: 4 pcs
Replace every 60 000 km
Coolant Capacity 6 L
Coolant Type G12 (Ford Motorcraft)
Coolant Change Interval 240 000 km
Thermostat Opening Temperature 90°C
Operating Temperature 90°C
Max Operating Temperature 120°C
Critical Temperature 130°C
Annual Maintenance Cost 600-900 USD

Reliability

Reliability rating: 8/10

Expected lifespan: 250 000 km

Common problems

Problem Severity Mileage Repair cost
Turbocharger failure Medium 100000-150000 km $800-1500
Oil consumption issues Medium 80000-120000 km $500-1000

Known defects

  • Early models had issues with turbo wastegate
  • Potential oil leaks from seals

Warranty extensions

  • Ford offers extended warranty options for engine components

Tuning potential

Tuning potential: Medium | Max. safe power: 300 hp

Stage Power Torque Method Cost
Stage 1 180 hp 280 Nm ECU remap only
Reliability impact: Minimal
$400
Stage 2 210 hp 320 Nm ECU, Downpipe, Intake
Required: Upgraded intercooler, ECU remap
Reliability impact: Low
$1200
Stage 3 250 hp 400 Nm -
Required: Bigger turbo, Upgraded fuel system
Reliability impact: Medium
$2500

Popular modifications

Tuning limitations

  • Stock turbo limitations at ~250hp
  • Cooling system may need upgrades for higher power

Cars with the Ford: HJBA engine

This engine was fitted to 1 model

Photo Brand Model Generation Production years
No photo
Ford Mondeo Mondeo V 2014 - present

All modifications (2)

Vehicle Generation Modification Power Gearbox Drive
Ford Mondeo Mondeo V 2.0 Hybrid 187 л.с. CVT 2WD 187 hp CVT 2WD
Ford Mondeo Mondeo V 2.0 Hybrid 187 л.с. CVT 4x4 187 hp CVT 4x4

Interesting Facts

  • Part of Ford's EcoBoost family of engines.
  • Known for its balance of performance and fuel efficiency.

Applications

Total produced: null

Vehicle Generation Years Power Markets
Ford Focus MK3 2012-2018 120hp/150hp Europe, USA, Asia
Ford C-Max MK2 2015-2020 120hp/150hp Europe

Compatible transmissions: 6-speed Manual, 6-speed Automatic

Drive types: FWD

Fuel Economy

Fuel Type Petrol 95
Octane Rating Minimum: 95 | Recommended: 98
Consumption (City) 8 L/100km
Consumption (Highway) 5.5 L/100km
Consumption (Combined) 6.5 L/100km
Real Consumption 7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L
Range 769 km
Cost per 100 km 10-12 USD

Emissions Standards

Emission Standard Euro 6
CO₂ Emissions 140 g/km
Particulate Filter (DPF) Absent
AdBlue Not Required

Awards and Recognition

  • International Engine of the Year (2013) — 1.0L to 1.5L

Comparison with competitors

Engine Brand Displacement Power Torque
EA211 Volkswagen 1,498 cc 150 hp 250 Nm
M274 Mercedes-Benz 1,496 cc 156 hp 250 Nm

Pros

  • Good balance of power and efficiency
  • Turbocharged for better performance

Cons

  • Potential turbo issues
  • Higher maintenance costs compared to naturally aspirated engines