Power Stroke 3.0L V6 Ford Power Stroke 3.0L V6

Дизельний V6 двигун з турбонаддувом, розроблений для високої потужності та ефективності.

Brand: Ford Type: Diesel Configuration: V6 Production Years: 2018 - теперішній час Production: Dagenham, England
138 Brand engines
2 Modifications

Technical Specifications

Engine Displacement 3.0 L (2,999 cc)
Configuration V6
Number of Cylinders 6
Valves per Cylinder 4
Power 250 л.с.
Torque 600 Н*м
Cylinder Bore 83.00 mm
Piston Stroke 92.00 mm
Compression Ratio 22.0:1
Firing Order 1-6-5-4-3-2
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection
Aspiration Turbocharged
Turbocharger Single turbocharger
Intercooler Yes
Maximum RPM 4,000 rpm
Max Torque RPM 1,750 rpm
Valve Train DOHC
Timing Drive Chain
Timing Chain Replacement 250000 or as needed
Block Material Cast Iron
Head Material Aluminum
Engine Weight 220 kg
Dimensions (L×W×H) 800 × 600 × 700 mm
Lubrication System Pressure lubrication
Cooling System Liquid cooling

Additional Information

Engine Family Ford Power Stroke
Manufacturing Plant Dagenham, England

Maintenance

Engine Oil Capacity 9.5 L (with filter: 10 L)
Recommended Viscosity 5W-30
Oil Standard API CK-4
Recommended Brands Ford Motorcraft, Mobil 1, Castrol
Oil Change Interval 16 000 km or 12 mo
Oil Filter FL-2051
Air Filter FA-1888
Replace every 60 000 km
Fuel filter FG-1000
Spark Plugs
Coolant Capacity 10 L
Coolant Type G12 (Ford Motorcraft)
Coolant Change Interval 240 000 km
Thermostat Opening Temperature 88°C
Operating Temperature 90°C
Max Operating Temperature 120°C
Critical Temperature 130°C
Annual Maintenance Cost 800-1200 USD

Reliability

Reliability rating: 8/10

Expected lifespan: 300 000 km

Common problems

Problem Severity Mileage Repair cost
Turbocharger failure Medium 100000-150000 km $1200-2000
Fuel injector issues Medium 80000-120000 km $800-1500

Known defects

  • Early models had issues with fuel injectors
  • Potential for EGR cooler failures

Warranty extensions

  • Ford offers extended warranty options for diesel engines

Tuning potential

Tuning potential: Medium | Max. safe power: 450 hp

Stage Power Torque Method Cost
Stage 1 300 hp 700 Nm ECU remap only
Reliability impact: Minimal
$600
Stage 2 350 hp 800 Nm ECU, Downpipe, Intake
Required: Upgraded intercooler, ECU remap
Reliability impact: Low
$1500
Stage 3 400 hp 900 Nm -
Required: Bigger turbo, Forged internals
Reliability impact: Medium
$3000

Popular modifications

Tuning limitations

  • Turbo limitations above 400hp
  • Cooling system upgrades recommended for high power

Cars with the Power Stroke 3.0L V6 engine

This engine was fitted to 1 model

Photo Brand Model Generation Production years
No photo
Ford F-150 F-150 XIV 2020 - present

All modifications (2)

Vehicle Generation Modification Power Gearbox Drive
Ford F-150 F-150 XIV 3.0L Power Stroke V6 250 л.с. 10-Автомат 2WD 250 hp 10-Автомат 2WD
Ford F-150 F-150 XIV 3.0L Power Stroke V6 250 л.с. 10-Автомат 4x4 250 hp 10-Автомат 4x4

Interesting Facts

  • First V6 diesel engine offered in the F-150 lineup
  • Designed for improved fuel efficiency and towing capability
  • Utilizes advanced turbocharging technology for better performance

Applications

Vehicle Generation Years Power Markets
Ford F-150 14th 2018-present 250hp North America, Europe
Ford Ranger T6 2019-present 250hp Global

Compatible transmissions: 10-speed Automatic

Drive types: RWD, AWD

Fuel Economy

Fuel Type Diesel
Consumption (City) 11 L/100km
Consumption (Highway) 8 L/100km
Consumption (Combined) 9.5 L/100km
Real Consumption 10 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L
Range 842 km
Cost per 100 km 12-15 USD

Emissions Standards

Emission Standard Euro 6
CO₂ Emissions 210 g/km
Particulate Filter (DPF) Present
Regeneration every 30,000 km
AdBlue Required
Consumption: 1.5 L/1000km

Awards and Recognition

  • Best New Diesel Engine (2019) — Diesel Engines

Comparison with competitors

Engine Brand Displacement Power Torque
Duramax 3.0L I6 General Motors 2,998 cc 277 hp 623 Nm
EcoDiesel 3.0L V6 Ram 2,987 cc 260 hp 600 Nm

Pros

  • Higher torque output compared to competitors
  • Better fuel economy in real-world conditions
  • Lightweight design for improved handling

Cons

  • Higher initial cost compared to gasoline engines
  • Potential for higher maintenance costs