SOHC 4.0 V6 Ford SOHC 4.0 V6

Ford SOHC 4.0 V6 - це надійний атмосферний двигун, відомий своєю витривалістю, але потребує регулярного обслуговування для уникнення проблем з ланцюгом ГРМ.

Brand: Ford Type: Petrol Configuration: V6 Production Years: 2001 - 2010 Production: Kansas City, USA
138 Brand engines
2 Modifications

Technical Specifications

Engine Displacement 4.0 L (3,996 cc)
Configuration V6
Number of Cylinders 6
Valves per Cylinder 2
Power 154 - 207 л.с.
Torque 305 - 380 Н*м
Cylinder Bore 93.00 mm
Piston Stroke 90.00 mm
Compression Ratio 9.7:1
Firing Order 1-4-2-5-3-6
Fuel System Multi-point Fuel Injection
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated
Intercooler No
Maximum RPM 6,000 rpm
Max Torque RPM 3,000 rpm
Valve Train SOHC
Timing Drive Chain
Timing Chain Replacement 150000
Block Material Cast Iron
Head Material Aluminum
Engine Weight 180 kg
Dimensions (L×W×H) 700 × 600 × 600 mm
Lubrication System Pressure lubrication
Cooling System Liquid cooling

Additional Information

Engine Family Ford V6 engine family
Manufacturing Plant Kansas City, USA

Maintenance

Engine Oil Capacity 5 L (with filter: 5.5 L)
Recommended Viscosity 5W-20, 5W-30
Oil Standard API SN
Recommended Brands Motorcraft, Castrol, Mobil 1
Oil Change Interval 8 000 km or 6 mo
Oil Filter FL-820S
Air Filter FA-1881
Replace every 48 000 km
Fuel filter FG-1053
Spark Plugs Type: Platinum
Part number: SP-515
Gap: 1.1 mm
Quantity: 6 pcs
Replace every 96 000 km
Coolant Capacity 10 L
Coolant Type G05 (Motorcraft)
Coolant Change Interval 240 000 km
Thermostat Opening Temperature 88°C
Operating Temperature 90°C
Max Operating Temperature 120°C
Critical Temperature 130°C
Annual Maintenance Cost 500-800 USD

Reliability

Reliability rating: 7/10

Expected lifespan: 250 000 km

Common problems

Problem Severity Mileage Repair cost
Timing chain tensioner failure Medium 100000-150000 km $800-1200
Oil leaks from valve covers Low 80000-120000 km $200-400

Known defects

  • Some models had issues with head gaskets
  • Oil pump failures in early production runs

Warranty extensions

  • Ford extended warranty for engine issues up to 5 years/60000 miles

Tuning potential

Tuning potential: Medium | Max. safe power: 350 hp

Stage Power Torque Method Cost
Stage 1 220 hp 420 Nm ECU remap only
Reliability impact: Minimal
$400
Stage 2 250 hp 450 Nm ECU, Exhaust System
Required: Cold air intake, ECU remap
Reliability impact: Low
$1200
Stage 3 300 hp 500 Nm -
Required: Turbocharger kit, ECU remap, Upgraded fuel system
Reliability impact: Medium-High
$5000

Popular modifications

Tuning limitations

  • Limited by stock fuel system
  • Turbocharging requires significant engine modifications

Cars with the SOHC 4.0 V6 engine

This engine was fitted to 1 model

Photo Brand Model Generation Production years
No photo
Ford Mustang Mustang 1995 - 2007

All modifications (2)

Vehicle Generation Modification Power Gearbox Drive
Ford Mustang Mustang 4.0 V6 190 л.с. 5-МКП 2WD 190 hp 5-МКП 2WD
Ford Mustang Mustang 4.0 V6 190 л.с. 4-Автомат 2WD 190 hp 4-Автомат 2WD

Interesting Facts

  • This engine was widely used in various Ford SUVs and trucks.
  • Known for its durability and ease of maintenance.

Applications

Total produced: approximately 500000

Vehicle Generation Years Power Markets
Ford Explorer 2001-2010 2001-2010 154hp/207hp North America
Ford Ranger 2001-2011 2001-2011 154hp/207hp North America

Compatible transmissions: 5-speed Manual, 5-speed Automatic

Drive types: RWD, AWD

Fuel Economy

Fuel Type Petrol 87
Octane Rating Minimum: 87 | Recommended: 87
Consumption (City) 13 L/100km
Consumption (Highway) 9 L/100km
Consumption (Combined) 11 L/100km
Real Consumption 12 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L
Range 681 km
Cost per 100 km 10-15 USD

Emissions Standards

Emission Standard Euro 3
CO₂ Emissions 280 g/km
Particulate Filter (DPF) Absent
AdBlue Not Required

Comparison with competitors

Engine Brand Displacement Power Torque
GM 4.3L V6 General Motors 4,300 cc 190 hp 400 Nm
Chrysler 3.7L V6 Chrysler 3,700 cc 210 hp 300 Nm

Pros

  • Reliable and easy to work on.
  • Good balance of power and fuel economy.

Cons

  • Less power compared to some competitors.
  • Fuel economy could be better.