Renesis 13B-MSP Mazda Renesis 13B-MSP

Роторний двигун Mazda Renesis 13B-MSP, відомий своєю високою потужністю та унікальною конструкцією, але вимагає частого обслуговування та уважності до стану ущільнень.

Brand: Mazda Type: Petrol Configuration: Rotary Production Years: 2003 - 2012 Production: Hiroshima, Japan
44 Brand engines
2 Modifications

Technical Specifications

Engine Displacement 1.3 L (1,308 cc)
Configuration Rotary
Number of Cylinders 2
Power 228 - 250 л.с.
Torque 211 - 240 Н*м
Compression Ratio 10.0:1
Fuel System Sequential fuel injection
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated
Intercooler No
Maximum RPM 9,000 rpm
Max Torque RPM 5,500 rpm
Timing Drive Chain
Block Material Aluminum
Head Material Aluminum
Engine Weight 120 kg
Dimensions (L×W×H) 600 × 500 × 400 mm
Lubrication System Pressure lubrication
Cooling System Liquid cooling

Additional Information

Engine Family Mazda Wankel engine family
Manufacturing Plant Hiroshima, Japan
Predecessor 13B-RE

Maintenance

Engine Oil Capacity 4 L (with filter: 4.5 L)
Recommended Viscosity 5W-30
Oil Standard API SL
Recommended Brands Mazda Genuine Oil, Castrol Edge, Mobil 1
Oil Change Interval 10 000 km or 12 mo
Oil Filter B6Y1-14-302
Air Filter B6Y1-13-Z40
Replace every 30 000 km
Spark Plugs Type: Iridium
Part number: B6Y1-18-110
Gap: 0.8 mm
Quantity: 2 pcs
Replace every 30 000 km
Coolant Capacity 7 L
Coolant Type G12 (Mazda Coolant)
Coolant Change Interval 240 000 km
Thermostat Opening Temperature 88°C
Operating Temperature 90°C
Max Operating Temperature 120°C
Critical Temperature 130°C
Annual Maintenance Cost 600-800 USD

Reliability

Reliability rating: 7/10

Expected lifespan: 200 000 km

Common problems

Problem Severity Mileage Repair cost
Oil consumption issues Medium 50000-100000 km $1000-1500
Apex seal wear High 80000-120000 km $2000-3000

Known defects

  • Apex seal failures in early models
  • Oil metering pump issues

Warranty extensions

  • Mazda extended warranty for engine issues up to 7 years/100000 miles

Tuning potential

Tuning potential: Medium | Max. safe power: 450 hp

Stage Power Torque Method Cost
Stage 1 280 hp 300 Nm ECU remap and exhaust upgrade
Reliability impact: Minimal
$800
Stage 2 320 hp 350 Nm ECU, Exhaust System
Required: Upgraded exhaust system, ECU remap
Reliability impact: Low
$2000
Stage 3 400 hp 450 Nm -
Required: Turbocharger kit, Upgraded fuel system, ECU remap
Reliability impact: Medium-High
$5000

Popular modifications

Tuning limitations

  • Limited by apex seal durability
  • Cooling system upgrades needed for high power

Cars with the Renesis 13B-MSP engine

This engine was fitted to 1 model

Photo Brand Model Generation Production years
No photo
Mazda RX-8 RX-8 2003 - 2012

All modifications (2)

Vehicle Generation Modification Power Gearbox Drive
Mazda RX-8 RX-8 Mazda RX-8 1.3 Renesis 231 л.с. 6-МКП 2WD 231 hp 6-МКП 2WD
Mazda RX-8 RX-8 Mazda RX-8 1.3 Renesis 231 л.с. 6-Автомат 2WD 231 hp 6-Автомат 2WD

Interesting Facts

  • The Renesis engine is the last rotary engine produced by Mazda.
  • It features a unique design with side ports for improved airflow.
  • The RX-8 was known for its lightweight and balanced handling.

Applications

Total produced: 200000

Vehicle Generation Years Power Markets
Mazda RX-8 SE3P 2003-2012 228hp/250hp Global

Compatible transmissions: 6-speed Manual, 6-speed Automatic

Drive types: RWD

Fuel Economy

Fuel Type Petrol 95
Octane Rating Minimum: 95 | Recommended: 98
Consumption (City) 13 L/100km
Consumption (Highway) 8 L/100km
Consumption (Combined) 10 L/100km
Real Consumption 11 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L
Range 500 km
Cost per 100 km 15-20 USD

Emissions Standards

Emission Standard Euro 4
CO₂ Emissions 250 g/km
Particulate Filter (DPF) Absent
AdBlue Not Required

Awards and Recognition

  • Best Sports Car (2004) — Automobile Magazine

Comparison with competitors

Engine Brand Displacement Power Torque
2JZ-GTE Toyota 2,997 cc 276 hp 368 Nm
SR20DET Nissan 1,998 cc 250 hp 368 Nm

Pros

  • Lightweight and compact design
  • High revving nature
  • Unique rotary engine characteristics

Cons

  • Higher oil consumption compared to piston engines
  • Limited torque at low RPM
  • Less fuel efficient than traditional engines