MZR 2.0 16V Mazda MZR 2.0 16V

Атмосферний 4-циліндровий двигун з багатоточковим впорскуванням, відомий своєю надійністю та ефективністю.

Brand: Mazda Type: Petrol Configuration: Inline-4 Production Years: 2002 - 2013 Production: Hiroshima, Japan
44 Brand engines
2 Modifications

Technical Specifications

Engine Displacement 2.0 L (1,999 cc)
Configuration Inline-4
Number of Cylinders 4
Valves per Cylinder 4
Power 143 - 150 л.с.
Torque 185 - 200 Н*м
Cylinder Bore 87.50 mm
Piston Stroke 83.00 mm
Compression Ratio 9.7:1
Firing Order 1-3-4-2
Fuel System Multi-point Fuel Injection
Aspiration Naturally Aspirated
Turbocharger null
Intercooler No
Maximum RPM 6,500 rpm
Max Torque RPM 4,000 rpm
Valve Train DOHC
Timing Drive Belt
Timing belt replacement interval 120,000 km
Block Material Aluminum
Head Material Aluminum
Engine Weight 130 kg
Dimensions (L×W×H) 600 × 500 × 600 mm
Lubrication System Wet sump
Cooling System Liquid cooling

Additional Information

Engine Family Mazda MZR family
Manufacturing Plant Hiroshima, Japan
Predecessor null
Successor null

Maintenance

Engine Oil Capacity 4 L (with filter: 4.5 L)
Recommended Viscosity 5W-30
Oil Standard API SL
Recommended Brands Mazda Genuine Oil, Castrol, Mobil 1
Oil Change Interval 15 000 km or 12 mo
Oil Filter B6Y1-14-302
Air Filter B6Y1-13-Z40
Replace every 30 000 km
Fuel filter B6Y1-13-Z40
Cabin Filter B6Y1-61-J6X
Spark Plugs Type: Iridium
Part number: B6Y1-18-110
Gap: 1.1 mm
Quantity: 4 pcs
Replace every 60 000 km
Coolant Capacity 7 L
Coolant Type G12 (Mazda Coolant)
Coolant Change Interval 240 000 km
Thermostat Opening Temperature 88°C
Operating Temperature 90°C
Max Operating Temperature 120°C
Critical Temperature 130°C
Annual Maintenance Cost 500-800 USD

Reliability

Reliability rating: 8/10

Expected lifespan: 250 000 km

Common problems

Problem Severity Mileage Repair cost
Oil consumption issues Medium 100000-150000 km $300-500
Timing belt wear Medium 100000-120000 km $400-600

Known defects

  • Some models may experience valve cover gasket leaks
  • Oil pump issues in early production runs

Warranty extensions

  • Mazda offers extended warranties for specific engine issues

Tuning potential

Tuning potential: Medium | Max. safe power: 250 hp

Stage Power Torque Method Cost
Stage 1 170 hp 210 Nm ECU remap only
Reliability impact: Minimal
$400
Stage 2 190 hp 230 Nm -
Required: Cold air intake, High-performance exhaust
Reliability impact: Low
$1200
Stage 3 220 hp 250 Nm -
Required: Turbocharger kit, Upgraded fuel system
Reliability impact: Medium
$3000

Popular modifications

Tuning limitations

  • Stock internals limit power potential
  • Cooling system upgrades recommended for high power

Cars with the MZR 2.0 16V engine

This engine was fitted to 1 model

Photo Brand Model Generation Production years
No photo
Mazda 3 3 (BK | 1 Gen) 2003 - 2008

All modifications (2)

Vehicle Generation Modification Power Gearbox Drive
Mazda 3 3 (BK | 1 Gen) 2.0 150 л.с. 5-МКП 2WD 150 hp 5-МКП 2WD
Mazda 3 3 (BK | 1 Gen) 2.0 150 л.с. 4-Автомат 2WD 150 hp 4-Автомат 2WD

Interesting Facts

  • The MZR engine family was developed in collaboration with Ford.
  • It features a lightweight aluminum block for improved fuel efficiency.

Applications

Total produced: null

Vehicle Generation Years Power Markets
Mazda Mazda3 BK 2003-2009 143hp/150hp Europe, USA, Asia
Mazda Mazda6 GG 2002-2008 143hp/150hp Europe, USA

Compatible transmissions: 5-speed Manual, 6-speed Automatic

Drive types: FWD

Fuel Economy

Fuel Type Petrol 95
Octane Rating Minimum: 95 | Recommended: 98
Consumption (City) 10 L/100km
Consumption (Highway) 6 L/100km
Consumption (Combined) 7.5 L/100km
Real Consumption 8.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L
Range 733 km
Cost per 100 km 10-12 USD

Emissions Standards

Emission Standard Euro 4
CO₂ Emissions 160 g/km
Particulate Filter (DPF) Absent
AdBlue Not Required

Awards and Recognition

  • Best Engine (2006) — 1.6L to 2.0L

Comparison with competitors

Engine Brand Displacement Power Torque
EA888 Volkswagen 1,984 cc 150 hp 250 Nm
K20 Honda 1,998 cc 155 hp 190 Nm

Pros

  • Good balance of power and fuel efficiency
  • Reliable and well-engineered

Cons

  • Can experience oil consumption issues
  • Less power compared to turbocharged competitors